To start, as the author of this work, I would like to start by appreciating the overall structure, information as well as the tone of the piece which was directed towards portraying the important story of how the life of Henrietta Lacks and the significance of HeLa cells came to be through the eyes of a reader. Get grade of a 100% was a first ever on any peice of writing i have written but it reminds me of how I have managed to achieve a knowledgeable, comprehensive and above all, a resourceful review of the work I undertook.

Having that in mind, I believe I made well thought of decisions regarding how I went about the topic in focus in this case. The formal, academic title “The Immortal Theft: The Life Taken for Science” appropriately fixes a serious tone and makes the reader interested in knowing the rest of the story. Sure, a more conversational title could work well in another context. However, I am well pleased with my approach given the type of publication.

In the course of the review, I have employed phrases that can be best described as technical scientific language English such as “cervical cancer” and “in vitro,” yet I have made it clear that I will include explanations so that lay persons who are the audience can be able to comprehend the article. Maintaining this equilibrium between depth and comprehensiveness in education was crucial.

Moreover, including such personal stories and views of Henrietta’s relatives into the review facilitates making such technological advancements more human because viewers see real people behind them. This helps avoid the feeling of it being too medical or too clinical.

Placing Henrietta’s story in the wider historical framework of racism and inhuman medical practices was an important decision. The mention of the Tuskegee experimentation and the exploitation of other communities helps in understanding the challenges she had to go through.

The combination of an scientific essay and the vivid style of writing, which has citations, fits the target secondary audience. Other approaches could work in different contexts, however for this particular article, this method serves the purpose of the review quite well.

In general, I would like to point out that such exact targets were set in the work arrange so, that it can be described as quite informative — though it in a way conceals the purposes of the examination. Encouragement that follows, given the comments and the grade, confirms that the objectives that were set were accomplished and the publication and its readers´ requirements were fulfilled. Being a reflective writer, I, however, consider exploring how the content might be modified for other audiences in higher contexts for example. But in the case of this task, I think the decisions that were made were both relevant and excellent.